A record of the Sportsman's Battalions during the First World War, including a database of soldiers who enlisted in - or served with - the 23rd, 24th and 30th Royal Fusiliers, originally raised by Mrs. Emma Cunliffe-Owen in September 1914. If you have any questions or comments, please send to fmsketches@macbrem.com, thanks!
Showing posts with label Finances. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Finances. Show all posts

February 23, 1915

Western Daily Press

CLIFTON FOOT HARRIERS – Owing to the death of Captain Bruce Melville Wills, Wessex R. E (killed in action), and of Mr. Hamlyn H Perham, Sportsmen’s Battalion, Royal Fusiliers these hounds will not meet to-morrow (Wednesday).

The funeral of Mr Hamlyn H. Perham, late of the Sportsman’s Battalion Royal Fusiliers, will take place too-day, at Flax Bourton Parish Church, at 3.45 p.m. The rector (the Rev. F. Tracey) made a feeling tribute, in his sermon on Sunday, to the deceased’s loyalty and devotion to duty.

The Times

BOXING AT THE N.S.C.

DENNY BEATEN BY DELANEY

The chief event at the National Sporting Club last night was a 200-round contest between the light-weights, Private J. Delaney (23rd Royal Fusiliers, Sportsman’s Battalion) and J. Denny (New Orleans) for £330. Delaney won in the 14th round.

After a quiet start Delaney forced the pace finely in the second round. He again took the honours in the third round, and Denny had to act chiefly on the defensive. In the fifth round Delaney kept his opponent away and scored fast, owing to his superior pace and ring tactics. The American was quite out classed, but was game until the end. At the close of the 14th round Denny’s seconds gave in for him.

It was Denny’s first appearance in this country. His record in America is an excellent one, and before the fight he and Kid Lewis were regarded as the most formidable opponents for Fred Welsh.

The Courier

JERRY DELANEY BEATS THE NEW LIGHT-WEIGHT.

YOUNG FOX, OF LEEDS, DEFEATS LAFFERTY.

With a card of a most attractive character arranged it was not surprising to fid a big attendance at the N.S.C. last night.

Jack Denny, the newly-arrived light-weight, was down to meet Jerry Delaney (who is now a private in the Sportsmen’s Battalion) over 20 rounds for £100 a-side and the Club purse. The articles stipulated that the men should weight 9 st. 9 lbs. Delaney was 2 lbs. inside, but the American went a quarter of a pound over, and it was only after severe skipping bouts that he passed the scale at the third time of asking.

The event of the evening, however, was a 20-rounds bout in the eliminating contest for the bantam-weight championship between Young Fox, of Leeds, and Alex. Lafferty, who claims to be the best lad of his weight in Scotland. Looking fit, the Scot pulled down the beam at 8 st. 5 ¾ lbs., Fox being ¾ lb. lighter.

Before the proceedings opened there was a little speculation over both matches, Fox at 6 to 4 on, and Delaney 5 to 2 on being respectively favourites.

FOX RECOVERS FINELY.

Of the two chief events, the bantam-weight contest came first. It went the full twenty rounds, but to a great extent was disappointing, as the Scot failed to justify the high opinion formed of him, and Fox won well on points. The Leeds man had a good pull in the matter of reach, and took full advantage of it, getting over or breaking through Lafferty’s guard time after time. Lafferty tried in-fighting both in season and out, but wasted a lot of well-intentioned right-handers. All the same, the Scott had the better of the opening rounds, and in the third Fox was down. Indeed, the latter looked like a loser for five rounds, but in the sixth he suddenly found his form. He then began to avoid the Scotsman’s left leads, and after doing a lot of good work toppled Lafferty over in the seventh round with a clip on the chin. From this point all the cleverness and generalship were on the side of Fox. Lafferty was always game, and right up to the sixteenth round exhibited pace, but he became very ragged towards the close, and, as already said, Fox won with a bit in hand.

DELANEY’S JUDGEMENT.

The Delaney v. Denny bout was a warm one. Delaney forced the work to commence with, and, hitting with plenty of force whilst paying particular attention to the fence, he outfought the American generally. By the end of the fifth round, Delaney had established a good lead. Denny adopted covering up tactics, but without being able to keep Delaney’s left out of his face. The Yorkshireman’s judgment was first-class, and he inflicted such severe punishment that at the end of the 14th round Denny was hopelessly beaten. The New Orleans man showed nothing like championship form at any part of the contest.

THREE GUINEA RECRUITS.

FRESH APPEAL FOR FUNDS BY MRS. CUNLIFFE'OWEN.

“KIT” MYSTERY.

Mrs. E. Cunliffe-Owcn, the chief recruiting officer of the Sportsman’s Battalions, who recently wrote to the “Daily- Express” stating that “men joining this battalion in future will be expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and be of the upper and middle classes,” has resumed her letter-writing activities and appeals for money.

A “Daily Express” correspondent writes that, although he, “like many others, had sent a subscription (£5) to the Sportsman’s Battalions,” he has now received another appeal in the form of the following letter:—

     Dear Sir,—The War Office have now called for an extra 500 men for the 1st Sportsman’s Battalion, which is in camp at Hornchurch, Essex, and have also authorised the immediate raising of a 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion of 1,600 men, making a total in all of 1,900 men still to be found.
     The camp and men at Hornchurch are considered to be second to none in the New Army, and the 2nd Battalion will be quite as good.
     The raising of these battalions places a severe strain upon our financial resources, and funds are urgently needed, as only a portion of the expense incurred in raising and equipping these battalions is recoverable from the War Office. May I ask you to kindly send a donation?
     Cheques should be made payable to me at above address, and crossed 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion Royal Fusiliers.
     If you could induce any of your friends to assist financially I should be most grateful. —Yours faithfully,
          E. CUNLIFFE-OWEN.
     Hotel Cecil, Strand, Feb. 19, 1915.

What has Colonel Viscount Maitland to say to this now appeal on behalf of his battalion?

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS.

The three questions asked in the “Daily Express” on February 5, however, still await answers.

The questions are :—

    1. How much money has been received ?
    2. How has the money been spent ?
    3. What is the present balance or deficit?

A new element of mystery is introduced, by a sentence in the following remarkable advertisement which has appeared daily in the “Times” for several weeks:—

1st and 2nd SPORTSMEN'S BATTALIONS, ROYAL FUSILIERS. Colonel-in-Chief, the King. C.O. 1st Battalion. Colonel Viscount Maitland. C.O. 2nd Battalion, Col. A. de B. V. Paget (His Majesty’s Bodyguard). Sportsmen, age 19 to 45, upper and middle classes only, Wanted at Once. There are still vacancies. Entrance is 3 guineas, or kit. No other financial obligations. Head Recruiting office, Hotel Cecil, London, Hours, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily.

What is the precise meaning of the phrase:—“ Entrance fee 3 guineas or kit”? The “Daily Express” understands that the Army authorities make an allowance of about £7 or £8 for the kit.

February 13, 1915

Daily Express

Mrs. CUNLIFFE-OWEN REPUDIATED.

APPEAL WITHOUT COLONEL PAGET'S APPROVAL.

We have received the following letter from Colonel A. de B. V. Paget, commanding the 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion, recruits for which are expected by Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen, the chief recruiting officer, to pay not less than three guineas each: —

To the Editor of the “ Daily Express.”
     Sir.—With reference to the paragraph in to-day’s “Daily Express” headed "Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen's appeals,” I beg to state that the appeal for funds to the recruits of the 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion was issued without my knowledge or approval, and that I deprecate in the strongest manner communications passing between the organisers of the battalion and the non-commissioned officers and men without my knowledge.
               A. DE B. V. PAGET. Colonel, Commanding 24th (S) Bn. Royal Fusiliers (2nd Sportsman's).
     Hotel Cecil, Feb. 12

Three appeals from Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen, “Chief Recruiting Officer ” of the Sportsman’s Battalions, for contributions to the funds under her control have been quoted in the “Daily Express."

One was to members of the 1st Battalion, another to those of the 2nd Battalion, and the third to a private householder.

In the appeal to the 2nd Battalion, which Colonel Paget repudiates, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen not merely asked all the rank and file to “help me as much as possible.” but added. “Will you get as many of your friends to help me as you can ?”

Colonel Viscount Maitland, commanding the 1st Battalion, has already repudiated Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s three-guinea tax.”

February 10, 1915

Daily Express

FINANCES OF THE SPORTSMANS.

MRS. CUNLIFFE-OWEN'S APPEAL.

An interesting sidelight is thrown on the finances of the Sportsman’s Battalions by a circular which Mrs. E. Cunliffe-Owen, the chief recruiting officer, sent to the men of the 1st Battalion at Hornchurch.

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen stipulates that recruits shall belong to the “upper and middle classes,” and pay not less than three guineas each on enlistment.

The circular which Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen sent to the men at Hornchurch is dated Hotel Cecil, November 21, 1914, and it begins with the candid statement that “unfortunately the time has come when I am faced with a most serious problem, i.e., the Finance of the Sportsman’s Battalion.”

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen proceeds to explain that she asked many rich and influential men to subscribe towards the battalion funds and necessaries required for the men over and above what the War Office allowed, but all in vain.

     “My husband and I lost our entire fortunes some ten years ago,” she proceeds. “Had we not done so, I should never have been forced to make any kind of appeal, as we should have been only too proud and glad to finance such a magnificent body of men as you are.
     “At yesterday’s finance meeting my hair nearly turned white, as I have to find sufficient money to pay for the enclosed list of things, for which the War Office will not pay.”

Then follows the list of “things,” which include canteens, hospital (thirty-three beds), barber’s shop, cupboards, mats, looking-glasses, and “administration right up to date.”

    “I do not know,” the circular continues, “if you are aware of the fact that our entire accounts are kept by Messrs. Deloitte, Plender, and Griffiths, chartered accountants, so that all expenditure is carefully watched.
     "Every little helps, and I suggest each hut subscribing whatever the inhabitants feel inclined and disposed to give.”

The circular concludes: “When the work is a little less I hope each hut will ask me to tea, as I should like to get to know each personally.”

February 8, 1915

Daily Express

SPORTSMEN’S EXPENSES.

FIVE DAYS’ SILENCE OF MRS. CUNLIFFE. OWEN.

FIGURES WANTED.

Five days have come and gone, and no more letters to the “Daily Express” from Mrs. E. Cunliffe-Owen! No offer to tell an admiring country all about the terrible expense of raising and equipping the Sportsman’s Battalions, of which Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen is “chief recruiting officer.”

Having roused the wonder and sympathy of her fellow-countrymen by announcing that she has spent £7,000 more than she expects to recover from the War Office, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen coyly abstains from confiding in the public the little details which might persuade it to throw its money at her feet.

“ Please don’t imagine that we have made any money out of it,” Mrs. Cunliffe- Owen said to a “Daily Express" representative, "for we have not made a single farthing out of it.”

That being so—and Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen volunteered the statement—would it not be better in every way if Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen were to invite the public to come to her aid. instead of asking recruits to pay part of the expense? If the public were told what the money was for, it might subscribe.

Is it that Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen is so busy that she has no time to go into the matter ? If so, the “Daily Express” would be glad to go through the accounts and draw up a statement of receipts and expenditure.

MANY GIFTS.

We understand that many hundreds of pounds have been given—single cheques as large as £200, at least—by men who have joined the Sportsman’s Battalions.

If Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen cared to announce the items on which the money has been spent, some patriotic millionaire might step in and provide for any remaining needs.

She assured a “Daily Express” representative that money has not been spent on luxuries.

“The money in the first instance.” she said last week, “has been expended in clothing, boots, etc., of superior cut and quality.”

It would be interesting to know exactly what price has been paid for these outfits “of superior cut and quality.”

     How much for tunics and trousers? How much for overcoats?
     How much for boots?
     How much for cups?

We understand the War Office allows about £7 10s. for kit per man. Men who think of joining the Sportsman’s—and of paying something towards the £8 to £10 “extra’’—will be glad to know by how much the cost of kit exceeds the War Office figure.

Will Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen say how far these figures differ from those she has paid:

Tunics and trousers ................... 29s.
Overcoats ................................... 35s.
Boots ........................................... 15s.
Caps ............................................ 3s.

That would make a total of £4 2s., leaving £3 8s. for the rest of the kit.

As the “Daily Express” has already stated, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen and her staff occupy a very large apartment in the Hotel Cecil—large enough for a carriage to drive round in—and on wet days one of the largest halls in the hotel is used for drilling (in rubber shoes); there are said to be a couple of rooms for typists.

MORE QUESTIONS.

It would perhaps induce the public to put up some money if Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen would state:—

How much per week does the recruiting office and work cost?
What allowances are made for expenses?
How much is paid for motor-car hire for the use of the recruiting staff?

The answers to these questions would, at any rate, satisfy the curiosity of men who may have thought of joining the Sportsman's, and may have been deterred from joining by doubt as to bow their money would be spent.

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen speaks proudly of the camp of the 1st Sportsman’s at Hornchurch.

The expenditure on this camp would, we are sure, be of widespread interest, especially to other less fortunate battalions. How much, for instance, was the furnishers’ bill? What about the officers’ mess?

Were men ever invited to subscribe for plate for the officers’ mess?

UNJUSTIFIABLE.

To the Editor of the " Daily Express.”
     Sir,—As one who has something to do with the control of postmen I must protest against what considerable experience has proved to be an altogether unjustifiable attack on a large portion of the members of his Majesty’s Post Office staff'.
     Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen may have been carried away by the enthusiasm of the cause she has taken up, but surely such au utterance was neither tactful nor called for, and is calculated to cause considerable resentment among a generally cleanly and well-conducted body of public servants.
     Also, judging from the tone of Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s statement of Monday night, there appear to be a great risk of one forming the opinion that a strong snobbish element exists in the Sportsman's Battalions—which I, for one, would be extremely sorry to think is so.
          POST OFFICE OFFICIAL.

[There is no reason to suppose that any of the men are snobs.—Ed., “D.E.”]

“ J. F. W.” writes to the “ Daily Express” asking how men can join the Sportsman's Battalions without paying three guineas.

Men are still wanted for the 1st Battalion, of which Viscount Maitland is colonel. The camp is at Hornchurch, Essex. There is no fee for admission.

February 6, 1915

Daily Express

SPORTSMEN’S KITS.

ACCOUNTANTS' OFFER TO MRS. CUNLIFFE-OWEN.

SOUTH AFRICAN MAN REJECTED.

Mrs. E. Cunliffe-Owen, the chief recruiting officer of the Sportsman's Battalions—who stipulates that recruits shall belong to the “upper and middle classes,” and pay not less than three guineas each on enlistment—has not yet obliged the “Daily Express” with any reply to the questions that were asked on Thursday and Friday :—

     1. How much money has been received?
     2. How has the money been spent?
     3. What is the present balance or deficit?

The point is : Why does Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen ask men enlisting in the King's Army to pay her, as chief recruiting officer, three or more guineas?

The exact words of the question in a form which recruits have been asked to fill up is :—

How much can yon pay towards the extra cost (£8 to £10) of your own kit?

This question would probably convey to the mind of the average recruit of the “upper and middle classes” two ideas : —

1. That his own kit would cost from £8 to £10 “extra,” or above War Office allowance.

2. That if he paid up to £8 or £10 to Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen she would spend his money on his “own kit.”

When a “Daily Express” representative asked if the outfit costs from £8 to £10 above the War Office allowance, however, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen said : “ No, but there are all the other expenses, and we estimate it all works out at £8 to £10 a man, but you can’t print it like that, so we put it down as kit.”

Your own kit!

HOW WAS IT SPENT?

It does not seem an extravagant suggestion that Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen should state how the money has been spent, if it has not, as she says, all been spent on the men’s “own kits.” Her explanation would enable other men to judge whether they were likely to get good value for their “own kit” money.

The public would also be interested if Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen would say how many men have been rejected by her because they would not, or could not, pay three or more guineas.

In October she issued a leaflet on which it was expressly stated “Donations towards the cost of raising and equipping the battalion will be gratefully received; but this is not a condition of enlistment. Everything will be found free of charge.”

Then why charge three guineas now? One man who was rejected told a “Daily Express” representative his experience yesterday.

    “I served in the South African war for two and a half years,” he said, “and, being a tailor by trade, became sergeant- tailor. I am now a married man with children, but I thought I would offer my services for this war, and I went to join the 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion.
     “ I saw several officers and was then passed in to Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen. She asked me about my service, and I told her I served four years in the old Volunteers and two and a half years in South Africa. She then asked me where I had been working since, and I told her the names of the firms I had worked for.
     “ ‘Oh,’ she exclaimed, ‘you had better go to some other regiment.’
     “ I was surprised, and as I was going out I spoke to an officer and told him what had happened. He said: ‘ That’s all nonsense, and went in to see Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen. I was called in again, and she said: ‘Well, are you prepared to pay eight or ten guineas?’
     “I drew myself up and answered: ‘Madam, an old soldier does not expect to pay for giving his services to the King. He expects the country to pay him for his services.’
     “ Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen threw my papers down and said: ‘Well, at your age you had better go and join some other regiment! ’ That ended the interview.
     “What Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen meant by ‘your age ’ I don’t know, as I am thirty- eight, and her battalion is open to men up to forty-five.”

AN OFFER.

As Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen states that she has spent about £7,000 more than the War Office will refund, she may be glad to avail herself of the following generous offer:—

To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir,—With reference to your comments in connection with the accounts of the recruiting fund for the Sportsman’s Battalions, we take the opportunity of saying

that we shall be pleased to undertake the work of honorary auditors to the fund, if those in authority would care for us to act in that capacity.—Yours faithfully,
          CECIL PERRY AND CO.
                    (Accountants).
     Hanover-buildings, Maddox-street, W.

ALL GENTLEMAN.

A member of the 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion, in a letter to the “Daily Express,” states that it is superfluous for Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen to say that the battalion is composed only of “gentlemen.”

    “We are all gentlemen,” he adds, “who have realised our duty at a time like this, and donned the King’s uniform. Possibly the polish is not quite so brilliant in some battalions as the Sportsman's, but then every recruiting officer is not such a competent judge of a gentleman as the chief recruiting officer of the Sportsman’s!
     “Unfortunately, some of the best gentlemen have not the necessary three guineas to put down, and also prefer to show their sporting spirit by embracing the society of the rough diamonds one always finds in the majority of Kitchener’s battalions.
     “If gentlemen with their own butlers and three motor-cars are not prepared to sleep on a mat or board if necessary, then Heaven help them when they get into the fighting line; they’ll possibly be glad of a square yard of dry earth. It really is ridiculous to read some of the remarks made concerning the welfare of the Sportsman’s.
     “I do not suppose the Germans will take the trouble, or they may in their absolute ignorance and stupidity not be able to distinguish the social difference between the Sportsman’s and the rest of Kitchener’s Army.
    “ However, from personal acquaintance and continual contact with a number of the Sportsmen, I can safely say that, should we be so fortunate as to get to the front, social distinction will be forgotten, and the Sportsmen will know how to do their duty, and put up with the inconvenience of muddy trenches and damp blankets, etc., the same as any others of ‘Kitchener's Fighting Gentlemen.’ ”

The First Sportsman’s Gazette – No. 7

EDITORIAL

THE “DAILY EXPRESS,” MRS. CUNLIFFE-OWEN, AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS.

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen last week issued an announcement to the effect that men joining the battalion in future will be expected to pay a minimum of three guineas, and be of the upper and middle classes. A controversy with the Daily Express followed, in which the newspaper accused Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen of snobbery and insinuated that the Sportsman’s Battalion are not intended for the front. So far as the latter charge is concerned the editorial interview with Lt.-Col. Gibbons, printed in this issue, and the expression of opinion contained therein is sufficient repudiation. Altogether the controversy is most unfortunate, both from a battalion point of view, and having regard to the greater outside interests involved. We must heartily support our own Colonel and Colonel Paget in their dignified repudiation of any connection with Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s manifesto. To a certain extent Mrs. Owen has our sympathy. The idea of the Battalion was hers, and she worked indefatigably to get it established. It is a great pity, therefore, that she apparently fails to realise that there comes a point in every enterprise when, by the mere process of growth and expansion, it seeks to break away from leading strings. Let Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen be satisfied with having raised one of the most promising Battalions of the New Army, and all will yet be well.

For the purposes of record we produce Lord Maitland's letters to the Daily Express in this connection:

Grey Towers, Hornchurch, Essex.
                         To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir.—In justice to the battalion under my command, permit me state that no “entrance fee” is, or ever will be, imposed on recruits joining the 1st Sportsman’s Battalion, as you infer by applying the plural in your criticism of the “Sportsman’s Battalions” in your issue of January 30.
     All men offering their services to the King through my orderly-room are welcomed to our ranks, the sole qualifications being a good record and compliance with our somewhat high physical standard.
                         I am, Sir,
                                   Yours faithfully,
                MAITLAND, Col. Commanding 23rd (Service) Bn., Royal Fusiliers (1st Sportsman’s).

Grey Towers, Hornchurch, Essex.
                                                         2nd February, 1915.
                        To the Editor “Daily Express.”
     Sir.—I much regret that a matter of principle should have forced me into public controversy with Mrs. Cunliffe Owen. All who have seen the magnificent battalions she has been instrumental in raising must admit that the Country in general and the War Office in particular owe this energetic and capable lady both thanks and gratitude. If I may say it, she fails only in one respect—she does not recognise her own limitations. Raising a regiment is one thing, training a regiment is another, and this latter is as much beyond the scope of the most capable woman as of any inexperienced civilian. Mrs. Cunliffe Owen has raised this battalion, I, with the (assistance of my Officers, am training it, and I shall be proud if in my sphere, I prove to be as successful as she has been in hers.
     Mrs. Cunliffe Owen asserts that I have no practical concern with recruiting in my battalion. Since the middle of November, my recruiters have enlisted 255 men without the expenditure of one cent, of public money, and with a total cost in advertisement of 7s.! Of course, Mrs. Cunliffe Owen’s expenditure of £8 to L10 cost per head is no private concern of mine, but it would seem that this figure might be materially reduced were less resort had to press advertisement.
     On the other hand, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen—during the same period—has not increased our ranks by as much as a score of recruits, though complaints have reached me that men offering themselves at the Hotel Cecil for service in the 1st Battalion have been enrolled in the newly formed 2nd Battalion on the pretext that the 1st Battalion is up to strength—the fact being that we are only 1,309 strong, whereas our full compliment is 1,636 officers and men.
     The fact that Mrs. Cunliffe Owen nominated—not appointed as she puts it—me for the Command of this Battalion is irrelevant to the point at issue. I was appointed by the Secretary of State for War and to him, through my General, I am responsible for the discipline and training of the Battalion.
                         I am, Sir,
                                   Yours faithfully,
                MAITLAND, Col. Commanding 23rd (Service) Bn., Royal Fusiliers (1st Sportsman’s).

The esprit de corps of the battalion will enable every member of it to heartily endorse the sentiment of ’these soldier-like replies.

COMMISSIONS.

We have been approached not once, but fifty times during the past month to open our columns to a discussion of the thorny question of commissions. This we feel we cannot do. The Staff of the Regimental Gazette have been considerably helped and encouraged in their work by the Colonel and other officers, and it would scarcely be fair to them to print many of the ill-considered communications which we have received on the matter. Still, there are generally two sides to every question, and as the Gazette is to be a “medium for the expression of free opinion," we feel that we cannot altogether ignore the subject.

A great deal of objection seems to have been taken to the fact that the Colonel has decided to discourage all ‘applications for commissions, the ground of the objection being that many men were officially advised to join this battalion in order to ultimately qualify for commissions. That there are several hundred men here who could be made into successful and efficient officers is quite patent and obvious. But the Colonel's point of view, as we understand it, is this. If the battalion is ever to become a fighting unit men must come here to stay, and not merely for a transition period of training for something else. On the other hand there is a distinct hardship in joining a thing believing, figuratively speaking, that “all things were possible,” and ultimately discovering that you are nobbled to the ranks notwithstanding any superior qualifications which you may possess. It amounts to this, therefore, that from a Battalion point of view the Colonel is unquestionably right, but we respectfully give it as our considered opinion that from a national point of view, his action may possibly be open to legitimate criticism. However, as soldiers we trust that regardless of any pros and cons, every member of this battalion will loyally accept the Colonel's ruling in this as in all other matters. Napoleon said that the baton of the Field-Marshal rested in every private soldier’s haversack, and one- has a sort of feeling that if Lord Kitchener is short of good officers he will get them somehow, and that the Sportsman’s Battalion will be well in the running when that time comes along. We fully agree with Mr. H. C. Woods, the well-known war correspondent, when he says that young men of the right type and with the necessary qualifications, should in the special circumstances be encouraged to prepare themselves with a view to ultimately taking up commissions. Finally, in our judgment, one of the best uses to which the Sportsman's Battalion and all other similar corps could be put would be to provide the country in her hour of need with as many fully trained officers as possible.

DISCIPLINE.

Discipline must be maintained. That is admitted by every intelligent person. But it has become generally known throughout the country that in certain regrettable instances the letter of military law has been carried out in circumstances demanding rather its spirit. In some other cases quite the reverse has been observed, and men have been given latitude which ought never to have been allowed. Granted that the times are difficult and the conditions quite unprecedented, it still seems to us only reasonable to point out that when men take great and lofty sacrifices in order to render service to their country, they are entitled at the very least to expect tactful and sympathetic treatment within the limits of service traditions. We are glad to acknowledge that the majority of the officers of the Sportsman’s Battalion are not only genuine sportsmen but really good fellows, and we are hoping that when trenching operations have been completed and real field training at last begun, the battalion will recover all its old careless gaiety and enthusiasm. Such an end requires that we all pull together, remembering that we are all in the same show and for the same purpose. There may, for the time being, be differentiation of rank, but there is and must be a common bond of service for the national weal. That is a desideratum for ultimate success.

ED.
REGT. SERGT.-MAJOR J. MERRICK.

INOCULATION AND VACCINATION.

A lady reader writes to say that she has heard with surprise that certain members of the battalion have refused to be inoculated for typhoid or vaccinated, and forwards us statistics of the U.S.A. Army and also a letter from a British Cavalry Officer to prove the “great benefit resulting from these respective treatments.” She asks us to bring these particulars to the notice of the objectors in the hope that they might realise the fallacy of refusing to avail themselves of such comparatively harmless safeguards. We carry out our correspondent’s request with pleasure. No man/ in this camp should refuse to benefit by scientific knowledge gained after much experiment and at the cost of great risks to those who originally undertook the work, especially when the inconvenience and discomfort both of inoculation and vaccination are so negligible when compared with the value of certain immunity from the malignant diseases of typhoid and small-pox. We heartily endorse our friend’s appeal to “carry on with the inoculation and vaccination—and be sportsmen.”

REGIMENTAL BAND (A SECTION).

MAINLY About PEOPLE.

Notes concerning members of the Sportsman’s Battalion.

Beeson, V. W. (Lance-Corporal). - Was trained for the musical profession by his father, the well- known bandmaster of the Holborn Union Band and the Peel Institute Military Band. Lance-Corporal Teeson was for some time Bugle-Major in the Volunteer Civil Force, now the Volunteer Territorial Force. Although so young he has conducted several ladies’ and junior bands in the L.C.C. parks and elsewhere. His sporting interests are running and rowing.

Cooke, S. M. (Private).—Born in Cornwall. Is a late member of the London Stock Exchange. Has represented the Thames Rowing Club for some years at the Henley Regattas. Besides being a noted oarsman, Private S. M. Cooke played for the Kensington Football Club when that club was at its zenith.

Crum-Ewing, N. R. (Private).—A native of Glasgow, he comes of an old Dumbartonshire family. Was educated at Harrow and Pembroke College, Cambridge. Won Classical Scholarship at Cambridge, and took his B.A. in ’96, afterwards entering for the Indian Civil Service Examination. He received an Eastern Cadetship in the Federated Malay States. For twelve years he filled several judicial and administrative appointments. In 1910 he left the Civil Service and went in for rubber planting, returning home shortly afterwards. Private Crum-Ewing has travelled a great deal in Asia, America and the West Indies.

Drake, John (Private).—Born in London, but comes of a well-known Devonshire family. During the last fifteen years he has lived in South America, where in Brazil and the Argentine he has been actively engaged in the breeding of fine cattle and horses. He has also been interested in tree planting on the Delta of the Parana. Private Drake really intended coming to England for a holiday, but as he arrived in this country just before the outbreak of war, he decided to show others a good example by being one of the first to join the Sportsman’s. His family have already sacrificed three members, and he has many relations in the service.

Gardner, A. F. (Private).—Born at Exeter. Inventor of the stud tyre and “Auto Anti-Tannic Teapot. Has lectured throughout Great Britain on behalf of the Indian Tea Committee to support the Indian grown plant. Private Gardner has also taken an active part in advocating Tariff Reform. Previous to joining the Sportsman’s he spent two years serving in the Leicestershire Yeomanry. His son was at school in Bruges only two hours before the German occupation, and after some exciting adventures arrived safely in England.

Hawley, Denton (Private).—Figure and portrait painter, was born in Sheffield. Received artistic training at the Academie Royale des Beaux Arts, Antwerp, and at Cormon’s Studio in Paris. Later he studied under Humbert and Carriere. Three years ago he made studies of Arab life and environment in Algeria. Has travelled much in France and Holland. He has exhibited pictures at St. Louis, U.S.A. and the North of England. Private Hawley has also drawn for the press and designed posters.

Henderson, Douglas (Private).—Nephew of Sir Alexander Henderson, Bart., M.P., was born in Middlesex, and educated at Emanuel School and Dulwich College. Twenty-two of his relatives are at present holding commissions in the Army, and one member of his family was killed at Mons. Has ridden across the Andes, South America, where he has been travelling for the last six years. Is well acquainted with Bolivia and North Chili. Private Henderson has experienced many extraordinary adventures in the course of his travels, which he has promised to relate in a future issue of the Gazette. His principal sports are rowing and tennis.

Jacobs, Joseph (Private).—Native of Manchester. Is a keen sportsman. Connected with the Turf for the past ten years, and is well-known amongst the racing fraternity. A turf commission agent by profession. Private Jacobs has acted on behalf of many celebrities in racing circles. He is a member of the leading London sporting clubs.

James, B. Edgar (Private).—Born at Chiswick, and educated at Bedford Modern School and Guy's Hospital. Has a dental practice in Oxford. It will be of interest to know that Private James, together with Corporal Cadman and Private H. E. Ward, was trained under Sergeant-Major Webb in the Oxford Volunteer Training Corps. His chief hobby is amateur gardening.

L. Kirby (Corporal).—Printer and traveller. Has journeyed through the canals of France to Paris,, and is well acquainted with the whole of the Western theatre of war. While on a visit to Chalons he was once arrested as a German spy, and was imprisoned for a week, until he was able to prove his identity. Is chiefly interested in caravaning and yachting, having taken part in yacht racing on the Norfolk Broads for thirteen years. He is also fond of shooting and tennis.

L. D Newitt (Private).— Son of Colonel and Councillor E. J. Newitt, V.D., of Southend-on-Sea, who is well-known in shooting circles, and is the author of “The Citizen Rifleman." Private Newitt is one of the younger members of the Battalion. He was educated at the Royal Technical College, Glasgow, and is now an undergraduate of London University. He is a good all-round shot, having won prizes in open and handicap competitions with rifle and shot-gun. Has travelled in the Netherlands, France and Spain. His hobbies are shooting, golf and motor-cycling.

Pat (The Editor’s Dog).—A faithful shaggy-coated Irishman. Joined the Sportsman’s Battalion a fortnight ago. Owing to indisposition is at present in London “on pass.’’

Tim (A 'Tabbie Cat belonging to Mr. C. T* Perfect, of the Village of Hornchurch).—Is 17 years old, and probably the most ancient feline in existence. Tim is as lively as a kitten at times, is extremely—almost aggressively humorous, and has written many articles and pamphlets, including a Reflection on the Sportsman’s, printed in this issue. We trust that others will follow in due course. Long live Tim !

Ward, H. E. (Private).—Retired steel manufacturer. Belongs to an old Yorkshire family. Educated at Clifton and Hamburg. Knows Australia and New Zealand very well. Has travelled a great deal in Germany, Austria, and parts of Russia. Fond of sports in general, his chief pastime is golf. He is a member of the O.U.G.C,

CIGARETTES FOR WOUNDED SOLDIERS.

Private W. G. Fraser, of Hut 21, brings to our notice a very deserving charity. He has received a letter from Sister Dempster of the Colchester Military Hospital, stating how delighted wounded men from the Front are to receive the packets of Wild Woodbine cigarettes which have been regularly forwarded to them by our own hospital here at Grey Towers. Parcels of cigarettes to the value of about a guinea are sent weekly, and if any men care to join in with this gift, small contributions may be sent either to Private Fraser at Hut 21 or to Private The Hon. W. B. Wrottesley at the Extension Hospital.

N.B.—Only Woodbine cigarettes are appreciated-

THE GUARD ROOM.

It has been suggested to us that a few shelves for the purpose of keeping food would be a great improvement in the Inner Guard Room. At present sugar, butter and other comestibles are placed on the floor, a proceeding not exactly calculated to improve their quality. We believe that our indefatigable Quartermaster will remedy this defect as soon as he hears of it.

LlEUT.-COL. A. ST. H. GIBBONS.

A PERSONAL IMPRESSION.

By William J. Harvey.

Kipling has said that it is “God’s own hour when you lie half-awake on your camp bed somewhere in the wilds, with the fumes of last night’s embers in your nostrils, while the dawn of a new day is swinging over the Eastern horizon.” One always envies men who have these experiences to recall— hunters, trackers, men who work on the “far-flung frontiers of Empire.” Of such a brotherhood is Col. Gibbons, and" a few minutes in his company reveal the man of action, inured to hardship and personal peril, trained to instinctive action and control by long association with Nature in her wildest and most capricious moods.

LIEUT.-COL. A. ST. H. GIBBONS.

The subject of this brief personal sketch was educated at Christ's, Cambridge, and represented his college at nearly all sports, including cricket, Association and Rugby football, and the boat. In addition he played in many matches for the ’Varsity. In 1882 he was gazetted to the 3rd (Militia) Battalion of the East Yorkshire regiment, but did practically permanent service with the Regulars until 1890, when he went to South Africa to serve with the Bechuanaland Border Police until 1893. It was at this point that he began those series of explorations which were ultimately to bring him such wide renown. In 1895-6 he led an expedition through the Kalahari Desert into the Upper Zambesi basin, which was then, with the exception of the section of the Zambesi done by Livingstone, and the east to west route of Capello and Ivens, a blank on the map. Between 1898 and 1900 he led a second expedition into the same country, travelling- up the Zambesi and completing the map of the Upper Zambesi basin, thence journeying via the Great Lakes to the Nile and Egypt. In 1904-5 Col. Gibbons was at the head of a memorable expedition into British East Africa. During the South African War he commanded a squadron of Younghusband’s Horse, and distinguished himself on active service as much as in the fields of exploration and sport.

During his travels Col. Gibbons has collected a great variety of trophies, a selection of which was awarded the gold medal at the St. Louis Exhibition of 1904. Moreover, he is the recipient of the medal of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society and the Grant Memorial of the Royal Geographical Society. In 1910 he retired from the 3rd East Yorks as 2nd in command.

He is the author of “Exploration and Hunting in Central Africa,” 1 vol. (Methuen), and “Africa South to North through Marotseland,” II. vols. (John Lane), as well as numerous papers read before various scientific societies. He is a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and the Royal Colonial Institute, and a member of the Junior Carlton and Sports Clubs.

The voyage which brought him home from Northern Rhodesia to offer his services was his 24th ocean voyage.

The writer asked Col. Gibbons to express his opinion of the Sportsman’s Battalion, and was favoured with the statement which follows: —

“I have a very high opinion of the material and quality of the battalion, and until recently rapid progress was being made. We have, however, suffered a check at the hands of the doctor and his inoculating appliances, and are being kept back by the necessity of trench digging over a longer period than is conducive to efficient progress in held training. The first is indispensable to a battalion destined for the front, as regards the second, apart from the experience gained, we have the satisfaction of knowing not only that the work done is officially admitted to be first-class, but that it is undertaken as a matter of national defence. By the end of the week the last word will have been spoken on inoculation, and I believe we will soon afterwards be released from trench work. We will then move rapidly forward, and I am confident will not only go the front with a high reputation, but will leave it with a still higher one.”

A VISIT TO THE IVY TEA ROOMS.

Miss Anton-Laing is to be heartily congratulated on furnishing and opening up High House, Hornchurch, as a kind of Regimental Club, solely and exclusively for the benefit of the officers and men of the Sportsman’s Battalion. There is no doubt that it supplies a long-felt want. Friends visiting the Camp can now be entertained in comfort and in surroundings both cosy and artistic. Miss Anton- Laing, is a charming hostess, and we hope that her venture will meet with all the success it deserves. The Tea Rooms are already popular with the officers and with those of the men who have been fortunate enough to discover them. That there will be many pleasant little dinner and supper parties down there in the near future is one of the “Things we Know.”

INTERIOR OF COOK HOUSE

ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL.

SPORTSMAN’S BATTALION v. ILFORD.

This match, played on Saturday, January 30th, at Ilford, produced one of the finest amateur matches played this season in the London District _(vide London papers). Higgins and Clunas were absent from the Battalion team, Ilford being well represented. Not once throughout the whole ninety minutes did the game slacken or become monotonous.

The ball travelled from end to end with great rapidity, first one goal keeper ,then the other, being hard put to keep out shot after shot. The large number of spectators present were disappointed in not seeing a goal scored up to half-time.

After a short breather the game was resumed, and continued at a ding-dong pace, being more like a cup-tie than a friendly match. At last, however, the brothers Hendren being well fed by Lieut. Hayes, got nicely going, and forced the Ilford backs to concede a corner. Pat Hendren took the corner, and placing the ball fast and accurately across the goal-mouth, Owers with a great effort turned the ball with his head into the corner of the net. It was a splendid goal.

After this both sides tried hard to score. At one time Kirton had shot after shot to repel, which he did in a masterly manner.

The Sports then took up the running, and gave the Ilford defence a very hot ten minutes, looking every minute certain to score, but the defence eventually prevailed; the game ended in a win for the Sportsman’s Battalion by one goal to nil.

For the visitors Kirton, Rawlings and Littlewort in defence were outstanding, while Pat Hendren and Owers gave of their best in the forward line, which is always a treat to spectators. Dines and the goal keeper for Ilford played line football. In fact, Ilford did more pressing than the Sports, but lacked finish in movements well started and carried out until near the goal.

The only fault in the Battalion team was the slowness in getting off their mark. Time after time the Ilford players nipped in and took the ball from the toes of their opponents.

The lack of speed in the Sportsman’s team can be accounted for by their want of proper training. Several trainers, indeed, have expressed the opinion that trench digging and marching would tend to make the team slow, and a short spell of sprinting each day would have a marked effect in removing this defect.

Ilford are anxious to play the Sportsman’s again next Saturday if a match can be arranged.

The Sunday Match between No. 2 and the Left Flank Company was watched by a large number of spectators. Lieut. Hayes kindly consented to referee. It was a well-fought struggle, both sides trying hard to win. No. 2 Company, however, was too fast for No. 4, and eventually won by 4 goals to 2.

The brothers Hendren and Skuse on the one side and Pearce and Glendening on the other played exceptionally well.

On Sunday afternoon Lady Maitland presented the Silver Cups generously given by Viscount Maitland to the winners of the Christmas Inter-company Matches arranged by request of the O.C. for those men remaining in Camp during Yuletiie.

The matches produced fine games. No. 1 defeating No. 4 and No. 2 Company defeating No. 3. The final between No. 1 and No. 2 Company on the same date resulting in a draw.

At the re-play on January 24th, after a fast and exciting game, No. 2 Company beat No. 1 Company and thereby won the Cups. The eleven Cups are beautifully designed, mounted on ebony stands, and richly engraved with the following inscription: “Inter-company Football Cup. Presented by Colonel Viscount Maitland. Won by (name) 23 (service) Battalion Royal Fusiliers (1st Sportsman’s).

Lord Maitland in a short speech expressed his great interest in the Battalion Football Clubs, and said that he was sorry that the match was not finished on Christmas Day, in order that the presentation could have been a public one. He trusted, however, that another Cup would be played for and the games finished on one day, and that the matches would be played in Germany.

The Captain of No. 2 Company team, Pte. E. H. Hendren, called for three cheers for Lady Maitland and three for the Colonel., which were given in a most hearty manner.

RUGBY FOOTBALL.

SPORTSMAN’S BATTALION OUTPLAY IRISHMEN.

Owing to the snowstorm on Friday, Jan. 22nd, the newly-formed Rugby section of the 1st Sportsman’s Battalion, who were to have played the 17th Empire Battalion at Whyteleafq, could not decide their inaugural match until Saturday last. Considerable difficulties are being experienced i;i finding opponents; but on this occasion Mr. Martin Doyle, the hon. sec of the London Irish R.F.C., came to the rescue, and although unable to take down to Grey Towers, Hornchurch, anything like a representative fifteen (twelve of the first team are with the Colours), the scratch side gave quite a creditable show.

Despite the fact that there was a margin of 24 points in favour of the Battalion, the game was never lacking in interest, by reason of the fact that the visiting pack, playing a typical Irish game, kept it very open. i

At the outset the Irishmen by means of strong rushes looked like scoring, but the Sportsmen replied in similar fashion, and twice in quick succession Pte. Williams ran in, the place-kicks failing. From this point to the interval the battalion did the bulk of the attacking. Pte. Wadham, who played in a style reminiscent of his best days, some twelve years back, was most unselfish, and it was mainly due to his excellent work that further tries were added by Lieut. Taylor and Pte. Gilmore. The former’s was improved upon, and the Sportsmen crossed over leading by a goal and three tries (14 points) to nothing.

Directly after renewing a clever intercepted pass by Wadham sent in Williams, who also added the major points. Again and again the Irish came to the attack; but two attempts at goal from marks were unsuccessful. Then after Gilmore had failed to improve upon his own try, O’Grady Walsh, with a good run along the touch line, scored the visitors’ only points. Just before the close Pte. Salvesen forced his way over, and Taylor converting, the Sportsmen won by 3 goals and 4 tries (27 points) to one try.

Sportsman’s Battalion—Pte. J. P. Farr (Christ’s Hospital), Pte. L. Williams (Bedford Grammar School), Pte. H. F. Wadham (U.C.S.O,B, and Middlesex, capt.), Pte. G. A. Salvesen (Vernon, British Columbia, F.C.), Pte. G. T. Fianey (Burton R.P*C,), Lieut. H. Taylor (R.H.S., Edinburgh), Pte. P, Henri (Sherborne Coll.), Pte. W. J. Stretton (Burton R.F.C.), Capt. H. B. de Bourbel (R*P.A,), Pte, D. L. Ciernentson (Clifton College), Pte. J. M. Gilmore (Watsonians), Pte. S. Thompson (Hull and E. Riding), Pte. G. V. Spurway (Sherborne College), Pte. H. N. Lyster (London Irish), Pte. L. T. Sharland (Streatham).

Mr. M. Doyle’s XV.—A. Hussey, P. O. Norton, P. J. Lindsay, R. A. McKinnon, E. O’Grady Walsh, M. R. Gardner, J. Nunnan, G. C. Walsh, Rev. W. N. McCann (capt.), F. N. O’Kelly, M, T- Goulding, A. Fenton, W. Bailey, P. O’Brien, F. Connolly.

Pte. F. G. Harris (Queen’s House, Blackheath), was the referee.

Following upon the football match the visiting team and their friends were entertained to “high tea” in the Institute, at which Viscount Maitland, Lieut-Col. Gibbons, Capt. A. de Bourbel, Capt, Church, Dr. Hill, Lieuts. Cockell, Thompson, Hill- coat, Winter, and Sidney Smith, and many ladies, were present. Subsequently a capital entertainment was provided under the presidency of Lieut. Suckling, and managed by Pte. F. G. Harris.

Included in an excellent programme were a humorous recitation by Lieut. S. Smith, songs by Corpl. Smith, Lee.-Corpl. Moir, Messrs. Thomas and O’Reilly, some amusing stories by Pte. Sullivan, sleight-of-hand tricks by Pte. Williams, and an exhibition three rounds by Ptes. Delaney and Hooper, which were greatly enjoyed. Delaney also gave a fine display of his ground exercises and an exhibition of skipping.

BASKET BALL.

There are in the battalion many men who have played Basket Ball, and it has been suggested that a team be formed to indulge in this pastime, playing under American rules. Games can be arranged with the American Rhodes Scholars at Oxford, the American Students at Guy’s Hospital, the Ealing Y.M.C.A., the London Central, and others. Will any member of the battalion who would care to join a Basket Ball team kindly hand in his name to Private L, S. Lee, Hut 14.

February 5, 1915

Chelmsford Chronicle

SHORT RATIONS AT ROMFORD

A CARTAGE AGENT CHARGED WITH THEFT.

At Romford yesterday Joseph Bysouth, 43, a cartage agent, of Milton Road, Romford, was charged with stealing 28lb. of bacon, 3lb. of mutton, 3lb. of beef, 1 ½ lb. of dripping, seven loaves of bread, and 1lb. of tea, value £2, the property of the Officer Commanding the Sportsman’s Battalion, at Hornchurch, on Jan. 30.

The case was begun on Monday, when Lieut. and Quartermaster Robert de Vere Stacpoole said that for a considerable time he had received complaints regarding a shortage of rations at the men’s meals. He knew that the full issue of rations had been made, so he suspected they were being stolen. On Saturday he instructed the sergeant of the guard to examine all vehicles leaving the barracks. The sergeant subsequently reported to him that the things mentioned in the charge had been found in the defendant’s van. Witness identified them as the property of Colonel Viscount Maitland, the officer commanding. Defendant had no authority to take the goods away.

Pt. C. F. Branson said he was on sentry duty, and he stopped the defendant’s van. He saw Sergt. Gille take a loaf of bread from a sack in the van. Defendant said, “That’s all I’ve got; I got it from the pig-tub.” Sergt. Gille found another loaf, and then took the accused to the guard-room.

Lance-Sergt. F. M. Gille said he asked the defendant what he had got in the van? Defendant replied, “Nothing, only some hay for the horses.” Witness found two loaves of bread. He also turned out two sacks that were in the van, and found the bacon, beef, tea, loaves, and other things. Defendant said, “I picked them up from the pig-tubs.”

Police-Sergt. Crowe said that when charged by Supt. Mules, the accused said, “I have a contract to take the swill away, and I saw two bags standing against the tub. I thought they were rubbish, and I put them in my van.”

Yesterday the case was again remanded for a week.

Daily Express

THREE-GUINEA RECRUITS.

MRS. CUNLIFFE-OWEN'S SILENCE ON THREE QUESTIONS.

WHAT IS THE RENT?

Mrs. E. Cunliffe-Owen has ceased to be amiable—to the “Daily Express.” Only yesterday we printed a letter from her in which she said, “ I have scarcely had breathing time this morning, and owe you an immense debt of gratitude for the wonders you are working for me. When you have the time, do come and see me. as I am sure we ,should work well together.”

When a “Daily Express” representative, glowing with pleasurable anticipation of the cordial welcome that awaited him, called yesterday at the Indian Room of the Hotel Cecil, however, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen would not see him.

He might as well have been a postman – “a real, grimy, horny-handed son of toil,” to quote Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s own words.

The “Daily Express” representative went to the Indian Room, the recruiting headquarters of the Sportsman’s Battalions, for the purpose of receiving Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s reply to the questions asked in yesterday’s “Daily Express” with reference to the cost of raising and equipping the battalions, recruits for which are told that they must pay not less than three guineas each and be of the upper and middle classes.

The questions are: —
1. How much money has been received?
2. How has the money been spent?
3. What is the present balance or deficit ?

“TOO MUCH ENGAGED.”

These seem very reasonable and pertinent questions, in view of Colonel Viscount .Maitland’s statement that he has recruited 255 men at an advertising cost of 7s.. while Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen has, as she has said, spent about £2,300 on recruiting, and altogether about £7,000 more than she expects the War Office to refund.

The “ Daily Express ” representative handed his card to the orderly in attendance inside the doors of the Indian Room. This is a very large apartment, the far corner of which is shut in with screens, so placed that the chair in which Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen sits at her desk commands a view of the area just inside the doors. Any one who steps beyond the waiting-corner comes “under fire.’’

The orderly took the card inside the screens, and after a few moments returned.

“Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen is too much engaged to see you,” he said with a faint smile.

The “Daily Express” representative asked the orderly to go back and say that he would like to see Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen at some later time.

“She can’t see you,” said the orderly, shaking his head.

“I should like to have Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s reply,” the “Daily Express” representative said.

“That is her reply,” the orderly answered; “she is unable to see you.”

ANOTHER DAY.

Asked if the “Daily Express.” representative was to understand that Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen refused to see him at any time, the orderly repeated: “She is unable to see you.”

So for the present we are unable to give Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s answers to the above questions. Perhaps she will oblige our readers another day.

The “ Daily Express ” was told yesterday about a thoroughly good recruit, who would have been particularly useful in the regiment, but who was immediately rejected by Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen when he said that he could not pay.

It would be interesting to would-be recruits for the Sportsman’s Battalions if Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen would announce:

What rent has been paid, and is being paid, for the Hotel Cecil quarters?

The “ Daily Express ” representative intended yesterday to ask Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen if the rent is £40 a week, as it is said to be.

It might also be stated whether the usual rent includes the use of one of the largest rooms in the Hotel Cecil, in which the recruits of the 2nd Battalion drill on wet days—wearing rubber shoes in order to save the floor.

READERS' OPINIONS.

As to the taste of Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s announcement that the battalions are only for “gentlemen” of the “upper and middle classes,” the “Daily Express” continues to receive many letters of protest, among them the following:—

"USURPED."

To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir, – I am glad you have called attention to the preposterous suggestion of asking in future an entrance-fee of three guineas and upwards to the Sportsman’s Battalions, and that the recruiting should be confined to men of the upper and middle classes, as such a demand must surely be most “un-sportsman”-like.
     I prefer to think that the men of this country, from whatever class they may be drawn, enlist solely from patriotic motives, and in that case are willing and prepared to serve together and to face every kind of hardship that may fall to their lot.
     Those who could only be induced to join, to use Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s words, “by giving them the best that is procurable in the way of equipment, food, beds, and so on,” are not made of the the real fighting stuff, but when an important position as chief recruiting officer, requiring sound judgement and common sense, is usurped by a woman, it is not surprising such blunders arise.
     That such a fine body of gallant men as the Sportsman’s Battalions are known to be should be liable to misrepresentation, and may I say, ridicule, through no fault of their own, is much to be regretted.
          AN OFFICER’S WIDOW.

POSTMAN V.C.

T0 the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir, – one would gather from Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen that the Sportsman’s Battalion is hardly being prepared for the trenches.
     Of what service will clothes of a superior cut and the best of equipment in the way of beds, etc, be to them when the battalion takes its place on active service?
     I have had fifteen years in the Post Office service, but have not yet met the “real, grimy, horny-handed sons of toil,” but that may be because I have not met Sergeant Hogan, the Postman V.C.
     Would Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen inform him that he would be out of place and not at home among gentlemen?
          A. J. WEST.

THE VERY LIMIT.

To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir. – You may well ask “ Why Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen?” for all of the snobbery I have ever read surely the very  limit and a bit more than has been reached in this case.
   Fancy having to tell two postmen “tactfully” that they were not “gentlemen”! Did you ever hear such inane rubbish?
     Hammersmith, E. CRABBE

February 4, 1915

Daily Express

THREE-GUINEA RECRUITS.

VISCOUNT MAITLAND’S REBUKE TO MRS. CUNLIFFE-OWEN.

MORE QUESTIONS.

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s position and doings as “chief recruiting officer” of the Sportsman’s Battalions continue to excite the liveliest interest.

The 1st Battalion, of which Viscount Maitland is colonel, is training at Hornchurch, in Essex, and Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen is now engaged in raising a 2nd Battalion at her recruiting office in the commodious Indian Room at the Hotel Cecil.

It might be supposed that Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen, as “chief recruiting officer,” would have filled up the 1st Battalion to its proper strength before undertaking the raising of a 2nd Battalion, the cost of which is, she says, so heavy that recruits are “expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and to be of the upper and middle classes.”

The 1st Battalion, however, is not yet complete, although Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen states that she has spent £7,000 more than she expects the War Office to refund to her.

VISCOUNT MAITLAND.

This point is made clear in the following letter which the “Daily Express” received yesterday from Colonel Viscount

To the Editor of the “ Daily Express.”
     Sir,—I much regret that a matter of principle should have forced me into public controversy with Mrs. Cunliffe- Owen.
     All who have seen the magnificent battalions she has been instrumental in raising must admit that tin country in general, and the War Office in particular, owe this energetic and capable lady both thanks and gratitude.
     If I may say it, she fails only in one respect—she does not recognise her own limitations.
     Raising a regiment is one thing, training a regiment is another, and this latter is as much beyond the scope of the most capable of women as of any inexperienced civilian.
     Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen has raised this battalion; I, with the assistance of my officers, am training it, and I shall be proud if, in my sphere, I prove to be as successful as she has been in hers.
     Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen asserts that I have no practical concern with recruiting in my battalion.
     Since the middle of November my recruiters have enlisted 255 men without the expenditure of one cent, of public

(cont)

February 3, 1915

Daily Express

THREE-GUINEA RECRUITS.

“SPORTSMAN’S" LEVY NOT SANCTIONED BY WAR OFFICE.

“KIT” AND EXPENSES

     War Office, Feb. 2,1915.
To the Editor of the “ Daily Express.”
     Sir,—In reply to your letter of to-day, Sir Reginald Brade desires me to say that the War Office have no information officially of the levying of a three-guinea entrance fee from recruits enlisting in the Sportsman's Battalion, and it has not received the sanction of the Army Council.
     H. C. GORDON, Private Secretary.

The “Daily Express” yesterday received the above letter with regard to the three-guinea-entrance-fee for Sportsman’s Battalions.

A “Daily Express” representative afterwards saw Mr. and Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen at the recruiting office of the Sportsman's Battalions in the spacious Indian Room of the Hotel Cecil, and asked for an answer to the five questions in yesterday’s “Daily Express” about the battalions, recruits for which are “expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and to be of the upper and middle classes.”

First of all as to the mystery of Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen being “Chief Recruiting Officer” of the battalions.

It is a curious circumstance that both Mr. and Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen have the one initial “E.” Mr. Edward Cunliffe-Owen, C.M.G., is the secretary to the Metropolitan Electric Supply Company. Mrs. Emma Cunliffe-Owen is the daughter of the late Sir Philip Cunliffe-Owen, K.C.B.

MUST BE A MAN.

“We wrote to the War Office and offered to raise a Sportsman’s Battalion,'’ Mrs. .Cunliffe-Owen said to the “Daily Express” representative, “and they authorised us to do so. Mr. Cunliffe-Owen is the responsible person—it has to be a man, but,-’ added Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen with a smile, “I really am Mr. Cunliffe-Owen.

“ Mr. Cunliffe-Owen cannot be here all day, so I am here, and for five months I have sat here from morning until night, acting as chief recruiting officer.

“ Please don’t imagine we have made any money out of it,” she said, “for we have not made a single farthing out of it.”

“The fact is,” said Mr. Edward Cunliffe-Owen, “that the expenses in connection with the first battalion amount to a sum which we are afraid will be over £7,000 more than we shall get repaid by the War Office. Then there is the second battalion.

“ We are responsible for the money. We have to pay for this recruiting office and the recruiting staff and the drill hall and advertising—printing and advertising have cost about £2,300 already —and other things.

“ What we wanted,” Mr. Cunliffe-Owen added, “was something special—men who would not enlist in other battalions—a better class of men.

" Me have men with their own butlers and footmen and three motor-cars!” Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen said, with much pride. “Men like that would not care to come down to sleeping on sacking!”

“ What about stipulating that men must be ‘of the upper and middle classes’?” the “Daily Express” representative asked.

“What else could we say?” Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen replied; " we could not say ‘Only clean men wanted; dirty men need not apply’!”

SIZING THEM UP.

“ How do you decide whether an applicant belongs to the upper or the middle class, or some other class?” she was asked.

“ Oh,’ said the “chief recruiting officer” with a laugh, “I see them all myself here, and I size them up.

“ If a man comes in whom I think unsuitable,” she added, “I tell him as kindly as I can that the battalion is only for gentlemen. He sees at once that he would not feel comfortable in the battalion, and says. ‘Oh, it’s no place for me, lady,’ and we send him to another recruiting office.’’

“ You know how uncomfortable your servants are if they have to sit down with you.” Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen said, sympathetically.

Asked if the War Office approved of men being expected to pay not less than three guineas each, Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen said, “ So long as we comply with the War Office requirements we can do what we like. It is a private enterprise, done for King and country out of pure patriotism,” she added proudly.

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen showed the “Daily Express ” representative a copy of the form which applicants for the three-guinea battalions have to sign. One of the questions is: “How much are you prepared to pay towards the extra cost (£8 to £10) of your outfit? ”

“Does the outfit cost £8 to £10 more than the War Office allows?” the “Daily Express” representative asked.

“No,” Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen replied, but there are all the other expenses, and we estimate it all works out at £8 to £10 a man, but you could not print it like that, so we put it down as kit.”

“I APPOINTED LORD MAITLAND.”

To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir,—Referring to my interview with your representative which you published in your issue of to-day, I am reported to have said that I appointed Lord Maitland to the position as Commanding Officer to the 1st Battalion.
     Your representative must have misunderstood me—what I did say was that Lord Maitland’s name was suggested to me by the military authorities, and his appointment was made by them after an interview with me.
          E. CUNLIFFE-OWEN.
               Chief Recruiting Officer.
     Hotel Cecil, Strand, Feb. 2.

[Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen used the words, “I appointed Viscount Maitland.” This statement seemed so incredible that the “Daily Express” representative challenged it twice, urging on the second occasion—“But surely, Mrs. Cunliffe- Owen, it must have been the King or the War Office authorities who made the appointment?” Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen was insistent, however, repeating: “I appointed him. I selected his name from a number of others before me.” She made no mention of his name having been suggested to her by the War Office authorities, or his appointment having been made by them after an interview with her.]

February 2, 1915

Daily Express

SNOBBERY AND ENLISTMENT.

REPUDIATION of the £3 3 0 FEE BY THE COLONELS.

‘THE SPORTSMAN’S.’

Colonel Viscount Maitland, commanding the 1st Sportsman’s Battalion, sends the following letter to the “Daily Express” in connection with Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s remarkable statement that men joining the Sportsman’s Battalion in future will be expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and be of the upper and middle classes : –

Grey Towers, Hornchurch, Essex.
To the Editor of the “ Daily Express.”
     Sir,—In justice to the battalion under my command, permit me to state that no “entrance fee ” is, or ever will be, imposed on recruits joining the 1st Sportsman’s Battalion, as you infer by applying the plural in your criticism of the “Sportsman’s Battalions in your issue of January 30.
     All men offering their services to the King through my orderly-room are welcomed to our ranks, the sole qualifications being a good record and compliance with our somewhat high physical standard.
     MAITLAND, Col. Commanding 23rd (Service) Bn., Royal Fusiliers (1st Sportsman’s).

THE ORIGINAL LETTER.

It was not the “Daily Express,” but Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen, that was responsible for the words “Sportsman’s Battalions” — in the plural. In proof of this we append Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen’s original letter on the subject of the three-guinea fee and the exclusion of any but “the upper and middle classes.”

    THE SPORTSMAN’S BATTALIONS. Royal Fusiliers.
Officers Commanding—
1st Batt.: Colonel Viscount Maitland.
2nd Batt.: Colonel A. de B. V. Paget.
     Hotel Cecil, Strand, London,
          January 29, 1915.
To the Editor of the “Daily Express.”
     Sir,—I have to thank you for your valuable help in making the Sportsman's Battalions, which my husband and I are raising, known throughout Great Britain, and to ask if you will add to our indebtedness by letting the public know that men joining this battalion in future will be expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and be of the upper and middle classes. There are no other financial obligations whatever.
     I would also like to remind the public that these battalions are the only ones permitted to recruit up to forty-five years, thus giving them seven years' extension over every other corps. Camp, food, and equipment are of the very best. Thanking yon in anticipation for making these facts known,
          E. CUNLIFFE-OWEN,
Chief Recruiting Officer.

The italics are ours.

COLONEL PAGET'S VIEW.

Colonel A. de B. V. Paget, the officer commanding the 2nd Sportsman’s Battalion, of which Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen is the “chief recruiting officer,” in an interview with a “ Daily Express ” representative at the Hotel Cecil yesterday, said : —

     “I cordially agree with the views expressed by Lord Maitland in his letter which you have just read to me, and personally I strongly deprecate any announcement that recruits are expected to pay a three-guinea fee and be of the upper and middle classes.’
     “At the same time I am powerless in the matter, inasmuch as until the men have actually enlisted they are not under my command. ’’

The colonel added that the “ three-guinea’’ announcement has caused great indignation among both officers and men of his battalion.

The “Daily Express” has asked four questions:—
     (1) Why pay at all?
     (2) Why this snobbery?
     (3) What has Lord Kitchener to say to this form of recruiting?
     (4) Are the Sportsman’s Battalions not intended for the front?

We now supplement this by the further question: —
     Why Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen?

THE DEFENCE.

In an interview with a “Daily Express” representative last night Mrs. Ounliffe-Owen stoutly defended her action.

    “The reason for asking a minimum entrance-fee of three guineas,” she said, may be found in the fact that the cost pe man, over and above what the War Office allows us, is from £8 to £10, and this cost is still rising.

“The money, in the first instance, has been expended in clothing, boots, etc., of superior cut and quality.

“The cost of advertising, stationery, hire of drill hall, office expenses, and a host of other things too numerous to mention, has also been very heavy.

“This payment of three guineas is being asked with the full knowledge and consent of the War Office.

“The Sportsman’s Battalions are certainly going to the front. They will be among the first.

“The only other outstanding question, so far as I am able to gather, is: Why say that men who wish to join this battalion will be expected to be of the upper and middle classes?

“Well, for the simple reason that by confining the battalion to gentlemen, and also by giving them the best that is procurable in the way of equipment, food, bed, and so on, we induce a number men to enlist who would not otherwise do so.

“Are we to allow men who are not clean who do not wash, men who would not be welcomed as associates by those already in the battalions, to come in and make discord?

“We had two would-be recruits – postmen I believe they were – in here a short time ago, real, grimy, horny-handed sons of toil.

“I told them as tactfully as I could that I was sure they would not be at home in our battalion, which was composed of gentlemen, and I referred them, as I have referred many others previously, to the recruiting office at New Scotland-yard.

“At the same time, it is true we have admitted gamekeepers and fish market employees to our battalions, and fine fellows they are.

“As to Lord Maitland’s letter, he has no practical concern with recruiting in his battalion. I appointed him, and I raised both battalions.”

January 30, 1915

Falkirk Herald

RECRUITS WANTED

For the ROYAL FUSILIERS, 1st SPORTSMAN’S BATTALION. Age, 45; Height 5ft. 6in. A Representative will attend. TO-DAY (SATURDAY), at CROWN HOTEL, FALKIRK, between 1 p.m. and 6 p.m.

God Save the King.

Daily Express

WHY?

Mrs. Cunliffe-Owen, “chief recruiting officer of the Sportsman’s Battalions, writes to the “Daily Express” that “men joining this battalion in future will be expected to pay a minimum of three guineas and be of the upper and middle classes.”

We would like to ask : —
(1) Why pay at all?
(2) Why this snobbery?
(3) What has Lord Kitchener to say to this form of recruiting?